ENG: Reading Comprehension Assignment

NO.1

Canada’s Tallest Tree

A man named Randy liked to hunt trees. He looked for big trees and old trees. He made maps to show where these trees were. He did not want to cut them down. He wanted people to take care of them.

Randy was told of a very tall tree on Vancouver Island. The tree was said to be 314 feet tall. That would make it the tallest tree in Canada. Randy set out to find the tree.

But someone else found it first. It was found by a logger. Loggers wanted to cut down Canada’s tallest tree and all the trees around it.

Randy made a path in the forest so people could see the tall tree. The tree was so big and beautiful it would fill them with awe. More and more people wanted to save that forest. Thanks to these people, that forest is now a park. Canada’s tallest tree is still there.

There may still be a bigger tree out there. Maybe you will find it. But there are only a few old forests left in Canada. Many are still at risk of being cut down.

Credits:
Story by Shantel Ivits at BC Open Textbooks
Adapted under Creative Commons license
Adaptations and exercises by Douglas Rodger, English Language Centre
Audio version performed by Cam Culham, English Language Centre
Public Domain images from WPClipart
  1. Why did Randy make maps?
    1.   The maps help the loggers.
    2.   Randy makes maps to help campers.
    3.   He makes maps to show where Canada’s biggest trees are located.
    4.   He makes maps because he works for the government.
  2. What did the loggers want to do to Canada’s tallest tree?
    1.   They wanted to cut it down.
    2.   Save the tree.
    3.   Take pictures of the tree.
    4.   Measure the tree to find out how tall it was.
  3. Why did Randy make a path to the tallest tree in Canada?
    1.   He needed the path to get home.
    2.   He wanted more people to see it.
    3.   He made a path so he could visit the tree more easily.
    4.   He made a path to help the loggers get to the tree.
  4. What does it mean to be “filled with awe”.
    1.   to be not interested
    2.   to be curious
    3.   to be amazed
    4.   to want money
  5. What happened to the forest where Randy found Canada’s tallest tree?
    1.   The loggers might cut it down in the future.
    2.   No one knows. It is a mystery.
    3.   The loggers cut it down.
    4.   It became a park.

NO.2

Gabriela worked for a multinational company as a successful project manager in Brazil and was transferred to manage a team in Sweden. She was excited about her new role but soon realised that managing her new team would be a challenge.

Despite their friendliness, Gabriela didn’t feel respected as a leader. Her new staff would question her proposals openly in meetings, and when she gave them instructions on how to carry out a task, they would often go about it in their own way without checking with her. When she announced her decisions on the project, they would continue giving their opinions as if it was still up for discussion.

After weeks of frustration, Gabriela emailed her Swedish manager about the issues she was facing with her team. Her manager simply asked her if she felt her team was still performing, and what she thought would help her better collaborate with her team members. Gabriela found her manager vague and didn’t feel as if he was managing the situation satisfactorily.

What Gabriela was experiencing was a cultural clash in expectations. She was used to a more hierarchical framework where the team leader and manager took control and gave specific instructions on how things were to be done. This more directive management style worked well for her and her team in Brazil but did not transfer well to her new team in Sweden, who were more used to a flatter hierarchy where decision making was more democratic. When Gabriela took the issue to her Swedish manager, rather than stepping in with directions about what to do, her manager took on the role of coach and focused on getting her to come up with her own solutions instead.

Dutch social psychologist Geert Hofstede uses the concept of ‘power distance’ to describe how power is distributed and how hierarchy is perceived in different cultures. In her previous work environment, Gabriela was used to a high power distance culture where power and authority are respected and everyone has their rightful place. In such a culture, leaders make the big decisions and are not often challenged. Her Swedish team, however, were used to working in a low power distance culture where subordinates often work together with their bosses to find solutions and make decisions. Here, leaders act as coaches or mentors who encourage independent thought and expect to be challenged.

When Gabriela became aware of the cultural differences between her and her team, she took the initiative to have an open conversation with them about their feelings about her leadership. Pleased to be asked for their thoughts, Gabriela’s team openly expressed that they were not used to being told what to do. They enjoyed having more room for initiative and creative freedom. When she told her team exactly what she needed them to do, they felt that she didn’t trust them to do their job well. They realised that Gabriela was taking it personally when they tried to challenge or make changes to her decisions, and were able to explain that it was how they’d always worked.

With a better understanding of the underlying reasons behind each other’s behaviour, Gabriela and her team were able to adapt their way of working. Gabriela was then able to make adjustments to her management style so as to better fit the expectations of her team and more effectively motivate her team to achieve their goals.

1. Gabriela’s management style worked well with her team in Brazil but not with her team in Sweden.
2. Gabriela’s team questioned her proposals and her decisions because they didn’t trust or respect her.
3. Gabriela was satisfied with her Swedish manager’s way of dealing with her problem.
4. Gabriela found it helpful to talk openly with her team about the differences in their expectations.
5. Gabriela faced a problem with her Swedish team because her management style was old-fashioned and wrong for the modern world.
6. The author believes that people from high power distance cultures and low power distance cultures should never work together.
TUMUHEIRE AGNES and Yandu Amos

Leave a Comment
Share
Published by
TUMUHEIRE AGNES and Yandu Amos

Recent Posts

QUESTION 4

4(a) what are your roles as citizen of Uganda?   (b) Each and every  individual in…

5 months ago

QUESTION 3

3(a) why do we political Eduction in the New Uganda curriculum?    (b) Explain the roles…

5 months ago

QUESTION 2

2(a) Describe the creation story in relation to the origin of man.    (b) Explain why…

5 months ago