

I’ve been thinking recently about a concept I call “The Principle of Many
Truths”. It’s a way of explaining why people can present differing points of
view depending on when and how they’re asked about something.
It’s hard to grok without examples, so here are a couple:
-
Someone claims to believe in God, yet they sin constantly and do not act
at all like a true Christian. People say, “They obviously don’t
truly believe if they act like that.” Yet they go to church and
tithe and profess belief at ever turn. The answer for many is simply
that both things are true: in rational or cynical moments they know
religion to be false, and in spiritual moments they do, in all honesty,
believe. -
Some people act like racists and claim not to be. To be clear, there are
some racists who know they are racists and simply lie about it for
obvious reasons. But many people who act like racists genuinely have
black/minority friends and love and care for them and see them as equal.
Yet they still dislike blacks in general and behave…well, like a racist.
In both cases we can stop searching for the mystery and the deception.
Humans are confused creatures most of the time, and those who aren’t trained
to rigorously self-evaluate are quite prone to harboring multiple opposing
viewpoints at once on significant topics.
In short, many racists are also not racists…in certain scenarios, in certain
conditions, regarding certain people. And many liberal, kind, non-racist
people behave in a very racist way…in certain scenarios, under certain
conditions, with certain people.
And many believers in God actually know he doesn’t exist…sometimes.
Similarly, many people who have shed their religious beliefs become
extremely pious at certain times, and absolutely believe.
When you ask most people what they believe, you’re most likely to get an
answer that they’re not fully aware of. They are at the whim of their
current state based on recent inputs and events, combined with the way you
asked the question, etc. And most do not seek out these dissonant viewpoints
in order to synchronize them.
They let them all exist in there together, to be called upon in the right
context. Even then the word “let” isn’t correct–this is happening
to them.
So the next time you see someone spouting opposing beliefs, don’t look
necessarily for some intricate system of deception. Look instead for
evidence that this person actually believes both views at different times.
Look for evidence that they hold within them many truths.
Related Posts

Technical Analysis: 4 Stocks with signs of death crossovers to keep an eye on

HDFC Bank & 3 other fundamentally strong stocks trading above 200 DMAÂ to keep an eye on

Falling Channel Breakout: Multibagger NBFC Stock Shows Bullish Momentum on Daily Chart

4 Fundamentally strong stocks to buy for an upside potential of up to 36%; Do you hold any?

0 responses on "How to Connect to an Astaro SSL VPN using OS X"