Huxley vs. Orwell: Whose Dystopia is Winning?

Gene Expression
recently put up a brilliant post showing data on the
GSS‘s WORDSUM scores correlated to various demographic data points, such as
educational attainment, political ideology, religious preferences, etc. From
the post:

A few years ago I put up a post, WORDSUM & IQ & the correlation, as
a “reference” post. Basically if anyone objected to using WORDSUM, a
variable in the General Social Survey, then I would point to that post and
observe that the correlation between WORDSUM and general intelligence is
0.71. That makes sense, since WORDSUM is a vocabulary test, and verbal
fluency is well correlated with intelligence.

But I realized over the years I’ve posted many posts using the GSS and
WORDSUM, but never explicitly laid out the distribution of WORDSUM scores,
which range from 0 (0 out of 10) to 10 (10 out of 10). I’ve used categories
like “stupid, interval 0-4,” but often only mentioned the percentiles in the
comments after prompting from a reader. This post is to fix that problem
forever, and will serve as a reference for the future.

You should definitely read
the entire post, but here are 10 interesting data points that leapt at me:

[ Caution: oversimplification ahead ]

1. As IQ scores have indicated for decades, women are more weighted towards
   the center in intelligence, i.e. fewer lows and highs.

2. The outliers for education are high school and graduate school, i.e.
   going or not going to one of those affects your scores the most. Other
   levels had very similar curves.

3. People in New England area are smart.

4. Liberals are the breakout political ideology in terms of top-end
   vocabulary/IQ.

5. Politically, “independent” seems to mean intellectually lazy, i.e. not
   having an opinion one way or another is more likely to be a sign of
   lower intellect rather than “rising above the pettiness”. This mixes
   well with a number of other datasets that I’ve seen on the topic.

6. The breakout groups for religious ideology is atheists and agnostics
   (see the main graph above). Naturally, that’s a stunner for
   me. Unsupervised Learning — Security, Tech, and AI in 10
   minutes… Get a weekly breakdown of what’s happening in security and
   tech—and why it matters.        

7. Among religious groups, Jews make everyone look like simpletons. But we
   knew that already.

8. For interpretation of the Bible, the data couldn’t be more stark (unless
   it was beheaded): the “word of god” crowd scored the absolute lowest,
   and the “book of fables” group scored the absolute highest. Again,
   highly unexpected.

9. For financial success information, which is one of the most interesting
   data points since it ties WORDSUM’s g correlation to a practical
   benchmark that everyone understands, i.e. “how much money you make”, the
   data is quite interesting. Essentially, the average wealth types are
   hyper-focused toward the center of IQ, while the lowest financial
   achievement is from those who score lowest and those who make over 100K
   score very high. A really interesting point here is for those who make
   another step above: as I’ve seen in numerous other places, this often
   tends to be a matter of privilege rather than merit, so that’s why the
   scores don’t jump away again like those with graduate degrees. Note to
   English teachers: hang this graph in your classrooms.

10. For the evolution question, the graph appears to have been created by a
    writer for the Jon Stewart show–only it wasn’t. The “developed from
    animals” question breaks the camps violently at the upper end of the
    spectrum in a visual that I think should accompany any evolution debate.

Overall, the post offers a compelling set of data that will no doubt serve
as a point of reference in many future discussions. It’s both kindle for,
and a culmination of, a thousand interesting conversations.

Be sure to read the whole thing, including his methodology for extracting
the data:http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/04/verbal-intelligence-by-demographic/

::