The School, University or venue where you study from
In a paragraph, describe yourself in relation to your learning or teaching
Click to select more than one option (multiple times)
Measuring the length or distance of a linear feature
Regular and Irregular Line Shapes
It is easier to measure a regular shape than an irregular shape. If a linear feature has a regular shape, that is it is a straight line, a ruler can be used to directly measure its length on the map. On the other hand, if a linear feature has an irregular shape, that is, it is curvy or zigzag in nature, either the edge of a piece of paper or a white thread (the type used by tailors), is used to measure the length of the feature, carefully following the curves. Mark the beginning and the end of the feature on the material you are using to do the measurement. After tracing or measuring the length of the feature on the map using the thread or paper, stretch out the material used over a ruler and read off and record the total length (usually in centimetres, or inches, as the case may be). Next, use the scale of the map to calculate the equivalent distance on ground.
Thus, the logical steps involved in calculating the length or distance of a linear feature are:
MD x MS
Lg = Length of a linear feature on ground. (This is usually in kilometres, or miles).
MD = Map distance (length of the feature as measured on the map. This distance is usually measured in centimetres, or inches)
MS = Map Scale (the denominator of the map scale)
100,000 = a constant used to convert from centimetres to kilometres (NB: 100,000 cm is equal to 1km).
If a portion of a road measures 6.3cm on a map at a scale of 1:50000, what is the length of the road portion on ground?
MD = 6.3cm
MS = 50000
3 x 50000
15km (NB: Always indicate the correct unit of measurement of your answer).
Analysing Road Network Connectivity
Roads connect different settlements in any given geographical area. For planning and development purposes, it is possible and often necessary to determine the level of connectivity in an area. The level connectivity in a place also indicates the degree of accessibility or ease of movement from one location to another in that place. Poor road connectivity in, say a city, means people will find it difficult moving around in that city. The desirable ideal situation, therefore, is to have full or one hundred percent connectivity. However, in reality full connectivity is hardly attained. By calculating the present level of road connectivity, planners and decision makers are able to know the number of additional road networks that might be needed to achieve full connectivity or at least significantly improve on the situation on ground.
A typical road network is made up of two important elements namely nodes and links
Nodes represent settlements while links (also known as arcs) represent road segments connecting the settlements.
Drainage here refers to streams and rivers. The drainage resources existing in a place are usually shown on topographic, physical geography, or hydrological maps. Drainage analysis is important for a number of purposes including water resources management, irrigation and other agricultural activities, hydropower supply, and so on.
We normally deal with two kinds of drainage analysis namely qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. Qualitative analysis basically has to do with description of the physical distribution and patterns of streams/rivers in a given place. On the other hand, quantitative drainage analysis is concerned with issues such as number of streams, bifurcation ration, length of stream, area of stream (or river) basin, stream density, stream frequency, and stream intensity.
Types of Drainage Pattern
There are different types of drainage pattern which can be shown on a map. Some of the major drainage patterns are identified and illustrated below.
Trellis drainage pattern: In a trellis pattern the distributaries of a stream run almost parallel to each other; hence they join the main stream at almost right angle.
Dendritic drainage pattern: This drainage pattern is similar to the branches of trees; it is characterised by irregular branching of the tributaries of a stream in different directions.
Centripetal drainage pattern: This pattern is characterised by many streams or rivers converging or flowing into a lake from different directions
Radial drainage pattern: In a radial drainage pattern several streams or rivers flow from a central highland (hill or mountain) to different directions away from each other
Having identified and delineated a particular drainage system for analysis, the first thing to do is to carry out a systematic ordering or ranking of the various stream segments making up that drainage system. There are several methods of ranking stream segments. However, for the purpose of this course we will adopt a modified version of the method devised by Strahler. In this method stream segments are ranked as 1st order, 2nd order, 3rd order, and so on. A first order stream is any stream segment that does not have any other stream flowing into it. When two first order streams meet they form a 2nd order stream. Similarly, when two 2nd order streams meet they form a 3rd order stream, and so on. It should also be noted that as indicated , when a lower order stream joins a higher order stream the resulting stream segment will still be that higher order stream. For instance, if a 1st order stream flows into a 2nd order stream, the stream segment produced will still be ranked 2nd order. In the same vein, if a 2nd order stream joins a 3rd order to produce a new stream segment, this new segment will be ranked 3rd order. It is only when two (or more) stream segments of the same order meet at a common confluence to form another segment that a higher order stream is produced.
Stream ordering helps us to identify and know the number of segments in each order or category, and hence, the total number of segments in the drainage system under consideration. It is, therefore, customary to create a stream order table after ordering the streams in a drainage basin. Table 2 has been generated based on the stream ordering in Figure 3.6; the Table shows the number of segments in each stream order.
Drainage Density (Dd)
Total length of streams
Dd = =
Stream Frequency (Sf)
This is the mean number of stream segments in a drainage basin per unit area of the basin. To obtain this index, simply count the number of stream segments in the basin and divide it by the area of the basin. This will give us an idea of the average number of segments per unit area.
Length Ratio (LR)
This index measures the relationship or ratio between the average length of all the stream segments belonging to a particular stream order and the average length of all the stream segments in the next higher stream order.
/ Sn+1Total length of 1st order streams / number of segments in 1st order
Total length of 2nd order streams / number of segments in 2nd order
Drainage intensity (Di)
This is a product of the drainage density and stream frequency. The formula for calculating drainage intensity is:
Di = = DdSf
Where: Dd = Drainage density
Sf = Stream frequency
Enter the destination URL
Or link to existing content