Categories: General

AI Will Likely Crush the B2B Services Economy

Midjourney 5.2

I’ve been talking to my buddy Joel Parish about AI since, well, forever
(2014?), and dinner last week was more of the same. This time we were
riffing about the impact of AI on the economy, jobs, etc. Pretty Basic
dinner convo for the Bay Area, honestly.

Anyway, we started thinking about how the economy breaks down into different
sectors, and which ones would be hit hardest. Lots of groups have done
similar analysis, including
this latest one by McKinsey. That one focused on the upside though, similar to
this piece
I did recently. In this convo, however, we were thinking about the downside
impact.

We started talking about services, which is where we think most of the
impact will be. And we were talking about companies that exist to provide
those services. Then we started thinking about the percentages.

Joel had the great idea to concentrate on the difference between B2B and
B2C. B2C seems less vulnerable because the product or service is going
directly from the creator to the buyer. We were in NOLA and were using
restaurants as an example, where the chef can have a great idea, make the
thing, and then serve it.

But B2B is different. It’s especially vulnerable to AI because it’s largely
middleware. Not completely, but largely.

So after that conversation I decided to dig in a bit on possible impact,
based on some numbers. First, how big is US GDP? Turns out it’s around $26
trillion or so.

Google

And how big is the services sector?

Google

77%.

That’s insane. Now for a harder piece. What percentage of that is B2B? Looks
like around half again.

Google

Let’s call that 37% of GDP. So—according to these very rough estimates—37%
of GDP is B2B Services.

AI Impact

So what percentage of that might be replaced by AI? That’s much harder to
say because of all sorts of variables:

  • How long are we talking about?

  • Are we talking about GPT-4 level, or like AGI with a 150 IQ?

  • Which services? Not all of them are equally automatable.

So given those constraints, let’s ask (of course) ask AI. I seeded it with
the information that AI at this particular moment (in the next 2-3 years)
can:

  1. Solve some creative problems

  2. Analyze proposed solutions and give recommendations

  3. Summarize nearly any sort of text content and reproduction it in various
    formats for various audiences

  4. Write, correct, and recommend documentation and many other types of
    text-based artifact

  5. Execute common tasks like sending emails, creating calendar invites,
    etc. via APIs

Given those (which I’d argue GPT-4 is getting very close to), here’s what it
came back with.

From GPT-4

50-70% lost revenue, and 60-80% lost jobs! That’s ~60% of 37% of GDP, which
is…22%.

22% of GDP.

Keep in mind this is all hand-wavy AI talking about AI, and based on
estimates of estimates. But I honestly can’t find much flaw in the reasoning
here.

More sci-fi stuff (but not really)

For giggles I decided to ask it to project based on a much smarter AI.
Here’s what happens if you ask it to do the same numbers with an AGI (my definition here) level AI with an IQ between 120 and 160.

From GPT-4

That’s ~70% revenue loss, and ~80% job loss. Again, based on a whole lot of
shenanigans, that doesn’t seem wrong to me.

What do we think this means?

Not much, really. This is all just napkin math stuff combined with science
fiction. The main point was to say that the Services economy seems
especially vulnerable to AI.

But that’s almost 80% of GDP. And B2B seems extra vulnerable, which is
basically half of that, bringing us to something like 40% of GDP.

And GPT-4 thinks if AI hits it in any significant way we could see somewhere
like 60-80% impact on the revenue and jobs in the sector.

I think our random guesses without any of this, um, “research”, was
something like 50% to 90% of B2B being gutted by AI. So there’s a
directional match anyway.

Now what?

I guess the takeaway would be for actual researchers to
think about:

  • What the largest portions of the economy are

  • Which are most vulnerable to AI

  • How different levels of AI would impact them differently, since more
    advanced AI cuts deeper into high-skill knowledge and creative work

Would love to hear your thoughts.

Gerald Businge

Leave a Comment
Share
Published by
Gerald Businge

Recent Posts

Bridging the Digital Divide: Uganda’s Education Revolution Through Digital Literacy and Teacher Training

Uganda's Bold Leap into the Digital Age Imagine a classroom where textbooks are supplemented by…

1 week ago

Uganda’s Digital Leap: Transforming Primary Education Through Technology

Uganda Plugs Into the Digital Age: A Classroom Revolution Imagine Ugandan students learning about the…

1 week ago

Uganda’s Education Renaissance: Combating Learning Loss and Empowering Educators

Uganda's Education Transformation: From Pandemic Response to Long-Term Vision The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges…

1 week ago

The Art of the Subjective: Exploring the Nuances of Book Reviewing

The Nuances of Opinion: Rethinking Book Reviews We often think of book reviews as definitive…

1 week ago

Crafting the Perfect Book Review: A Guide for Aspiring Critics

Beyond the Basics: Mastering the Book Review In the sprawling world of literature, book reviews…

1 week ago

Unveiling the Layers: A Deep Dive into Book Reviewing Beyond Plot Summaries

The Art of Book Reviewing: More Than Just a Summary Book reviews serve as vital…

1 week ago