A Philosophical Reason for Preferring Apple Over Android

Everyone knows smart people read and lazy people watch TV, but aren’t they
often doing the same thing?

I’m reading Game of Thrones right now, which is an epic fantasy series that
I highly recommend. Being a human, I’m inclined to think highly of my own
choices, and my desire and ability to consume books is one of the attributes
worthy of merit.

But if I’m reading Game of Thrones along with four other books, and someone
else is watching Game of Thrones (along with 5 other shows), what’s
the actual difference?

Aren’t we both enjoying the STN (Struggle Triumph Narrative) that we all
seek as part of our psyche? What’s the difference between doing it through
book or television?

I’ve known plenty of “avid readers” who read nothing but garbage. Are they
superior because they’re reading it rather than watching it?

I have a few candidate answers:

1. We respect what fewer people can do. Reading takes some discipline,and
   requires more reading skill to get fully immersed in a story–especially
   as the language gets more difficult.

2. Reading is often confused with reading non-fiction. People who
   read non-fiction for fun tend to be more educated, smarter, make more
   money, etc. So perhaps all reading is simply lumped together.

But neither of these are quite satisfactory to me. I think people like to
consume stories. We want to hear gossip. We want to know who won this or
that. We’re all about the struggle and the triumph.

So, if we’re all doing that, but some do it via opera and others do it
through romance novels, how much light is really between these two?

You could say that the former is more likely to understand this post, and
the latter is not, but that might not be accurate.

Get a weekly breakdown of what’s happening in security and tech—and why it matters.

Anyway, it’s worth considering. If you think watching TV is brain rot, but
you think reading is a way to “expand the mind”, explain yourself.

[ UPDATE June 2015: After speaking with my friend Andrew about this, we’ve
come up with another key differentiator, detailed below. ]

When talking with my friend Andrew we were trying to capture why avid
readers seem to have more mental faculties than avid consumers of
television.

I thought it was a matter of content, but he disagreed. He thought it was
the fact that you have to build a world when you read, whereas in TV you do
not because it’s being given to you.

I think that might be worth exploring.

On this view, it’s not so much what you’re taking in when you read or watch,
but rather the effort required to do so. So with television the creator has
built everything for you. How the characters look, the setting they’re in,
etc.

But with reading, your mind and imagination do all that work. So it’s
literally exercise every time you read, and that world-creating imagination
then becomes a metaskill that can help you in numerous other places in life.

I’m not sure this is it, and it’s probably a combination of this and content
quality anyway, but it’s an interesting theory.

[ Feb 25, 2013 ]