• No products in the cart.

DMZs: NATing vs. Using Public Addresses

valentine-one

If you’re into cars, driving fast, or just technology in general you’ve
likely heard of the Valentine 1 radar detector. It’s widely accepted to be
the premier radar detector on the market, and few people question this
status.

I got to thinking about what makes it so great, though, and my conclusion
was startling. Evidently, the entire reason the Valentine is supposed to be
so good is because
it can show you whether a cop is in front of you or behind you. The
entire idea is to have the ability to respond differently based on where the
radar is coming from. What?

Seriously, what are the options here? You’re going down a road listening to
some music and all of a sudden you get hit with radar from the front. What
do you do? Yeah, slow down.

Ok, so now you’re on the same road and you get hit with radar from the rear.
Now what? Is this the Dukes of Hazzard? Cannonball Run? You’re still going
to slow down unless you participate in an alternate reality.

So sell me on better detection. Sell me on less false positives. But don’t
put a big ugly arrow on the front and tell me that knowing where the radar
is coming from matters. It doesn’t. If I’m speeding and I get hit by radar —
I’m slowing down.

May 23, 2025

0 responses on "DMZs: NATing vs. Using Public Addresses"

Leave a Message