

Because insurers are paid a fixed percentage of the claims they administer,
they have no incentive to hold down costs. Worse than that, they have no
incentives to do their jobs with even a modicum of competence. To take one
small personal example, I have reached the age of Medicare eligibility but,
because I continue to work full time, have primary health insurance coverage
through my employer. Blue Shield, of course, wants to be sure it doesn’t pay
for any claim it doesn’t have to, so I was asked to attest to the fact that
I have no other insurance. No problem there, except such attestations seem
to be required on almost a monthly basis—requiring my time on the phone (and
on hold) with Blue Shield’s customer service, an oxymoronic term if there
ever was one, and also requiring my doctor and laboratory to call me, call
Blue Shield, or both, and thus also waste their time and resources.
This story and the many others of the same sort but even worse, magnified
across the millions of people subjected to private health insurance
companies, is why American health care costs so much and delivers so little.
Unless and until we as a society pay attention to the enormous costs and the
time wasted by the current administrative arrangements, we will continue to
pay much too much for health care.
via
The Reason Health Care Is So Expensive: Insurance Companies –
Businessweek.
I would go beyond this to say that the problem is a devotion to capitalism.
The problem is greed.
The right looks at a middle man making billions of dollars off of
healthcare, at the expense of the people who actually need the services, and
they say, “That’s a beautiful thing–those companies making money. That’s
what America was built upon.”
Conservatives are essentially morally retarded by the paint sniffing that is
profit worship.
Once we address that, then we can find all the places where huge
profits are made, and the incentives are not to give better services, or to
do so at lower costs, but instead to RAISE costs so that stockholders and
CEOs can profit.
Once we have identified those areas we can address them by moving to
something more like the Mayo model, which focuses on more equal pay, bonuses
based on outcomes, and eliminating waste cause by inefficiency or greed.
Related Posts

Technical Analysis: 4 Stocks with signs of death crossovers to keep an eye on

HDFC Bank & 3 other fundamentally strong stocks trading above 200 DMA to keep an eye on

Falling Channel Breakout: Multibagger NBFC Stock Shows Bullish Momentum on Daily Chart

4 Fundamentally strong stocks to buy for an upside potential of up to 36%; Do you hold any?

0 responses on "Why Lock Technology Stagnated for Decades"